The United Nations General Assembly voted 124-14 on Wednesday to strip Israel of the right to self-defense in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

The test of the resolution was based on the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion in July that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory was illegal.

The resolution also calls on member states not to sell arms or military equipment to Israel that would be used in Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem.

Among the 43 countries that abstained were Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Some 12 of the 27 European Union countries abstained, including Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Sweden.

  • scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The UN is a diplomatic organization. It is a forum to discuss things and literally has no actual means to enforce anything. Its goal is not enforcement, it’s to discuss.

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      And prevent such global wars like WWII. Funnily enough, the state of Israel was funded exactly by an UN resolution, and now Israel is trying to discredit the same institution that’s responsible for the existence of their state.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly. Every time the UN does something, people say “they can’t enforce it”.

      Well, that’s the whole point of the UN. To resolve things without using force.

      It’s a good design, designed by people who learned from the horrors of WW2.

      It’s sad to see how many people nowadays forget those lessons and are itching for global war.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You got it ass-backwards. The point of the UN as opposed to LoN was that it can enforce shit. And do that very heavily. The only problem was that the chosen group of wise and powerful to decide this now includes Russia as the heir of the USSR (why the hell) and China (which is not the China that got the place initially) and UK (which is collecting cannibals to suck off all over the globe) and USA (which just arbitrarily invaded Iraq and didn’t even apologize) and France (seems kinda normal, but CFA etc were not nice) and the situation really sucks.

        • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Russia and the US are involved because the other half of the UNs purpose is to keep them both from nuking shit.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I, personally, am itching for progress. In my lifetime. What history has proven is that progress is never achieved without bloodshed.

        Though there is one very easy step the US at least can take that isn’t bloodshed: STOP SELLING WEAPONS TO ISRAEL.

      • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Why does it really matter that issues can be “discussed” if the issue being discussed is as atrocious as what Israel is doing to Palestine.

        Israel and the US know that what they’re doing is wrong. Them and their crony countries aren’t going to change course because of this.

        It doesn’t exactly prevent WW2 if they tell Hitler to stop and he doesn’t listen…unless of course they choose to let him continue his goals unimpeded rather than go to war, citing their documented disagreement as sufficient counter action…

        • neatchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because there is value in a large group speaking with a unified voice to say “this is wrong, and you need to know that the rest of us think it’s wrong. Your behavior will affect the relationship you have with us all going forward”. Direct intervention isn’t the only form of consequence.

          Is it the best solution to the problem? No. Is it still worth doing? Yes.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If you hear 5 people yell at 5 people then they take a vote and the vote comes out 101 to 5 and the rest staying silent (hypothetical), it’s different than 53-53. It helps you understand what others believe/support while not having to listen to all of them talk.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So about as useful as us here as far as getting anything to actually happen :(

      • scutiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        When it comes to Israel, they have very little incentive in changing their ways when the US refuses to join the rest of the world in condemning them.

        Still, there are 124 countries that made it clear that they think what Israel is doing is wrong.