Maybe people should just understand that you don’t @ me if you don’t want me to chime in. It’s actually pretty fucking rude.

Yes! Also just recency of posting vs recency of replies/upvotes.

Hey, that second array is the whole diet of someone I knew in university who “hated sauce”.

By the way, the spell does not allow for divorce - it’s strictly “till death do us part”.

Which has… consequences

Is great until you need a job. It solves the 2 language problem right up until you’re working with others.

Yeah, uh, so, I used to be a galactic warlord…

FWIW, it’s not a starter set, it’s a playtest. It’s stress testing things, and leaning on Pathfinder assets. You’re not missing out on the full meal deal right now.

I don’t know, this is starting to sound like a separate discussion with separate issues, and as a result it feels like goalpost moving.

The issue with women’s fantasy armour has long been that it exists for the Male Gaze, as a trope that is propagated by men for the purpose of titilizing men. It’s objectifying the female form, and doing so in a way that does not include women in the discussion at all.

The second image, instead of being a continuation of that, just feels like fashion, and complaints about it land as “no one has ever cared about aesthetics in a suit of armour” which is a totally false take and indefensible platform.

That creative endeavor: A 5e clone with Blades’ progress clocks slapped on top of it.