Do they at least have an account on someone else’s instance then? If they do, it’s fine for them to not have to spend resources on maintaining their own.
Do they at least have an account on someone else’s instance then? If they do, it’s fine for them to not have to spend resources on maintaining their own.
Of course not, only extramarital sex is bad, not owning people, killing peoples, or married siblings having children together /s
What is the ‘not necessarily’ to? I dont see how your comment disagrees with any of theirs.
They should have used something like the Matrix or Signal protocol, some open standard, as opposed to RCS, which you can only use on Android with two proprietary apps - Google and Samsung Messages.
The whole point is that the AI would give them the individualised attention that a single teacher doesn’t have the time or concentration for. And yes, I think they said there would be a glorified babysitter in the classroom to help with the physical, rather than teaching, aspects.
Lemmy users hate AI for some reason, the luddites.
For a long time, Telegram has acted as if it’s above the law
What law? That the government can read and censor your private messages? Then good, and we should want it to stay that way!
Without a disclaimer that Telegram is a platform that anyone can use, and that is mainly used by non criminals, and policing speech in private chats is a really bad idea for privacy, it just seems like fearmongering to get people to hate Telegram, because obviously Facebook’s WhatsApp is so much better.
Sorry, my bad! Edited
Why? 2024-2001=21. That’s definitely old enough to be online
Edit: 23, definitely old enough
If the headline doesn’t describe the article, it’s clickbait and should be shamed.
I’m not from the Nordic countries, which are the best at ‘rehabilitation, not revenge’, though I’d like to be, I’m glad I’m not from somewhere as bad as America either.
Ah, thanks!
I’m using Sayboard which integrates well with Heliboard, but has lower quality than yours it seems. Its properly FOSS though, unlike Futo apps.
Now I know you’re from somewhere in the world where they don’t pronounce Z like zed!
Aside though, the rest of that is great dictation, what app are you using?
Another sad day for pro-preservation advocates
It’s not about knowledge of what exactly was the crime. What you didn’t get was that when I said death penalties were never the answer, I actually meant it. Not ‘death penalties are too bad for this crime, but if it’s bad enough, they’re the answer’. Death penalties are never the answer, regardless of how heinous the crime. If the person can’t be rehabilitated, they should be separated from society so they’re not a danger, but your comment is all about revenge, paying these people back, which I already said should not be the goal.
Death penalties are never the answer. The goal of the criminal system to be to rehabilitate criminals so they dont offend again, or, if that’s impossible, to separate them from society. Not some archaic sense of revenge or ‘justice’.
Fear mongering and authoritarian control over minors.
Technically you can create your own instance and post whatever you like, but if all the major instances defederate from you, it’s still a form of censorship.
Wow, unusual for them but based