Pfft.

  • Communist_Synthesizer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    They are absolutely NOT the good guys. Israel is having a smaller scale preview of what we’d see if we had the same scenario happen under a Trump presidency. We should try to curb their worst instincts, but you have to win the bloody election first to do it, and somehow account for the fact that the majority of Americans do not give a shit about Palestine.

    The last poll I saw on the issue, is that ranking issues from most important to least, Palestine ranked around #9. Behind everything from Immigration, Economy, Women’s rights etc. And opposing them is one of the most well connected, well funded special interest groups that exist in the US today, in a country that loves money in politics so much that we legalized bribery.

    It’s not an accident that some of the most vocal Pro-Palestinian voices in congress were primaried.

    In that political climate, the best you can do is to do harm mitigation and make sure Republicans aren’t in the driver’s seat come 2025.

    Yes, I’m being pragmatic. And I’d fucking hope you would be too, when millions of lives are at stake. I donated to Palestine for 20 years. Even back when I was living on a shoestring budget while I was in college. Do the feel good shit AFTER 11/20. I’ll be right there with you.

    And for the love of god, vote.

    Nobody gives a shit about nonvoters in this country. If you wanted to actually affect policy, a half a dozen congressmen that are willing to throw a wrench in things to get their way goes a LOT further than useless yammering about how you’re not going to vote because ‘both sides are bad’.

    A couple of Blue Dogs managed to derail single payer healthcare. We could absolutely do the same for the Palestinian issue, if you could be bothered to get off your ass and vote.

    • Sami@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Since being primarily concerned about the genocide is that unpopular of a position then why are you so concerned? If Harris made the decision that those voters are not as important to her then that’s that. You can’t have it both ways no matter how many self-righteous posts you make online.

      • Communist_Synthesizer@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Sounds like you don’t actually care about what happens and just want to feel self righteous and make some noise. So… the exact kind of person I had in mind making this.

        You couldn’t argue on the merits, so you went with, “Haha, sure, I’m doing bad things, but it won’t matter so why do you care?”

        Do you need me to spell it out for you to make it really obvious how dumb that argument is? Or were you just trying to be facetious?

        • Sami@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Not voting for a candidate who is tacitly supporting a genocide on that basis is not “doing bad things” no matter how much bad faith spin you try to add. The candidate has to earn the vote and that applies to non-voters too. Some people care about certain issues enough to abstain from voting on that basis and others vote strategically because its not a team sport. You just want validation for your own voting decision by implying those abstaining from voting are directly or indirectly responsible for your candidate’s opponent winning which they are not. If Harris wins or loses it will be based on her and her party’s policy and campaign decisions.

          • Communist_Synthesizer@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Did typing that feel good? I mean, if you’re going to be playing ‘fuck around and find out’ with millions of lives, at least you should be getting something out of it, right?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Since being primarily concerned about the genocide is that unpopular of a position then why are you so concerned?

        Because elections in this country are often decided on fractions of a percentage point.

        • Sami@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Either it makes political sense for her to adopt her current position or it doesn’t. You can’t get voters on both sides of an issue but you can mark where you stand on it and have people vote accordingly.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Either it makes political sense for her to adopt her current position or it doesn’t. You can’t get voters on both sides of an issue but you can mark where you stand on it have people will vote accordingly.

            What an astounding way to say absolutely nothing.

            • Sami@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              If they are decided by a fraction and you made the correct the political choice then you win. Hope this helps.