• The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    How about we start restricting how many businesses a company is allowed to buy out in a year. Maybe allow like 1-2 mergers a year. There no reason we should allow one company to buy everyone and then kill their products and services leaving the consumers holding the bag that will no longer function because the server is gone.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      One thing that I’ve always found interesting is that silicon valley has a common start up strategy that is basically: do well enough to get bought buy your bigger competition. Basically, be a threat so your VCs can cash in when a Google, Facebook, etc buys you.

      I’m other words, Silicon Valley has a start up culture that feeds an anticompetitive/anti-trust ecosystem. No one complains because they are all making money. It’s the users who slowly suffer and we end up were we are not with 5 companies running the modern web and Internet infrastructure.

    • KittyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’d go further, restrict the market cap for businesses so they have to spin off if they get too big. Add to that a value limit for the number of boards you can sit on so 30 companies can’t be controlled by the same people.