Much faster to skim the contents of an article than a video.

Having come from the world of C++, this was a huge step up.

I’m working on making robots do useful things. I think that’s fairly easy for most people to understand.

Does anyone think having a Bluetooth set and getting fed the answers is actually a problem? There are so many problems you need to handle as president that I don’t see any possible way for a human being to remember all of it. Just do your thinking offline, write down your reasoning and solutions, and clear your mind for the next thing.

You’re currently having a conversation on an article about cold storage. The comment you replied to was about this article, and hence also about cold storage. It makes absolutely no sense to come into this conversation saying that they’re wrong about how cold storage works because your experience with hot storage doesn’t line up.

Well, if that’s how it worked before, they must’ve changed it. I installed it last night without paying and it never blocked me.

Are you talking about DeArrow? The website gives you the option to pay or just download without paying.

Or “I thought you guys might find this interesting”

How does one then answer the question “If you think elections don’t work, then why do you participate?” by a non-anarchist?

You’ve made plenty of good points throughout the article about the problems with the system. I don’t see why that can’t be your answer. There’s no contradiction in acknowledging major problems and still exerting what little influence you do have.

But if they “work a little” for an anarchist, certainly they would work a lot for a non-anarchist.

How does that logic follow? Assuming you both have the same values and are trying to achieve the same thing, then a solution that works for one person will work just as well for another. The difference in opinions is on which solution will work, not on what you’re trying to achieve.

To be fair, you can find nearly any book for free online.