• Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Why would someone wanting to store huge amounts of data to put it on a storage device that is the most fragile/short lived?

  • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    All I want is higher resiliency SD cards. It must be a technology limitation with being unable to fit a good controller in there or something because I would gladly sacrifice speed and capacity for something reliable in a lot of my applications.

  • Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sigh…

    A couple of years ago there were discussions on how stupid 20+tb harddrives were, mainly because they are so slow that the time it takes for files to transfer to a spinning disk was too long.

    Let’s say you have a good 20tb drive and it can transfer files at 200MB/s. To fill that drive, it’ll take 1 day and 8 hours of continuous transfer. If it’s failing, and you’re trying to get as much off of it you’re screwed.

    Now let’s think about that micro SD card. It’s 4tb, and let’s be gracious and give it a v90 speed class. That’s 90MB/s. Looking at a calculation for the time it takes to fill it up, we’re sitting at about 14h and 14 minutes. Worst part is that SD cards don’t have SMART, meaning you don’t know when they’ll die.

    From my experience, even good SD cards die in my raspberry pi running pihole, and the cards runs idle almost all the time.

    Also there’s this thing that the higher capacity a storage device gets, the more valueable the data stored on it becomes, not directly because it’s high capacity, but because it’s more trusted by the user.

    Guys, gals and anyone in between, please get a proper storage solution, something that won’t fail spontaneously. If you need that kind of capacity, go for a Nas with spare drives, or at least get an ssd.

    /end rant

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Not all use-cases require a high speed:capacity ratio.

      I mean, I have an 18TB USB hard drive, which sustains transfer at about 50MB/sec in practice. It is nearly full, and its level of performance has never been a show-stopping problem.

      It’s hard to imagine a use case where a NAS would be a viable alternative to an SD card.

  • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    and both are described as SDUC UHS-I cards that are “built for tomorrow’s smartphones, gaming devices, drones, cameras, and laptops.”

    Gaming devices: ✅️
    Drones: ✅️
    Cameras: ✅️
    Smartphones: ❌️

    Basically every current flagship phone, and you know that’s what they mean, has done away with expandable memory…

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which is utter bullshit. Especially since a lot of lower end phones have the option for dual sim or one sim and sd. There is literally no reason for flagships to not have that and make file transfering easier.

  • dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is the kind of discussion i’m here for. Thanks everyone! I didn’t know SD and micro SD cards where this unreliable but i always use them for short term stuff or content that is backed up somewhere else so i think i’m good.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I paid $100 for a massive 1TB hard drive when they first came out years ago. Thought a TB was essentially unlimited and wasn’t sure if it could ever be used.

    What a crazy advancement to get to 8TB the size of your pinky nail.

    • fartnuggetsupreme@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I paid like $150 for a 1GB hard drive on my Toshiba Tecra 510CDT back in the 90s. The guys at the computer store weren’t sure if it would even work.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    SDUC supports up to one hundred and twenty eight Terabytes O.o

    Who in the world requires so much Storage on a tiny SD card?!