• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    There are essentially infinite choices for entertainment these days. Hypothetically, even if they somehow stopped 100% of piracy, I still wouldn’t pay for their overpriced slop.

  • Rayspekt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    Still not subscribing to all the shit services. I’d rather don’t watch stuff and go outside. Yeah, you heard me right, I’ll rather be going fucking outside!

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’d happily buy stuff if they’d just give me a mkv file or a disc that isn’t encrypted.

      I’ve been back to buying UHDs because I can rip them. Amazing how a good experience got me to pay again.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    The message also ends with a specifically worded call to action: “If possible, please use legal paid services. It’s something we should do to show our respect for creators and content producers.”

    LOL… they have fucked EVERY artist with the “streaming is a new medium and you get no royalties from it”. Even Black Widow herself had to fight Disney in court to get paid for her very own movie.

    Studios can go fuck themselves hard… they won stop piracy and they know it, this is why the always make such a big deal out of whatever little gain they make

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Studios need to remember that their shows are advertising for merch and toy sales. That’s where the money is. If I pirate your show, then you don’t have to support the infrastructure to provide me a stream (which would look like shit because you’re not google). I buy posters and tshirts and stickers. Some people buy minifigs and funcopops and other plastic tat that’s cheap to make but sells for, well, whatever that crap sells for.

    Furthermore, I wouldn’t mind paying $10 or $15 /month for ONE streaming service if it was able to maintain good picture quality at 1080p AND had all the shows/movies I wanted to watch in one convenient place. Extra emphasis on ‘convenient’. Even more emphasis on it actually having content I want to watch. When I watch a show, I like to watch the entire thing in like, two days. Then I’ll not watch any shows for two or three months, until something gets my attention. I don’t want to pay for a service I don’t use, cancelling and reactivating a service every couple of months is too much hassle, so I’ll just wait until the show is done airing and download it all and watch it at my pace.

    surprisingly, I miss dvds.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      All-in-one convenience is the only reason I pay Spotify, my only streaming service. Thought about dropping them, but it would be a monstrous hassle gathering, and continuing to gather, all those MP3s. Plus, I can download that content and use it in the woods with no internet connection. Sold.

      Video content? What a clusterfuck. I steal every bit of it. Hell, I got Amazon Prime and don’t bother looking at video offerings. Default: 🏴‍☠️

  • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    the only thing that will last forever is the file itself physical media cd.s only last for like 15 years 20 at most you need to get the files of the medium only then will it last forever. physical media is only temporary before you know it you cant play it anymore.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Good luck locating my hard drive with several Terabytes of movies, TV shows and music.

    If other sites would shut down I would share those files even if I need to send pigeons with usb sticks attached to their little feet.

    Human culture is to be shared. And that is just a basic moral principle that should be engraved on Human Rights declaration.

  • setInner234@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Piracy ends when content is offered in a convenient fashion. It’s always been this simple and always will be. Naturally, rich and out of touch people want to believe that more authoritarianism is the solution, because they got rich through their contempt for humanity, so why should this be any different?

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Here is how I see Piracy ending. We’re offered Netflix and forgot about streamers so the government went heavy handed and forced other governments to change all their laws and give up these pirates while seizing sites.

      Even though there are smaller pirates, the leaders of it so are mortality wounded killing any progress. We eventually end up with cable television 3.0 and try to go back to piracy. However while we weren’t looking there’s a ton of new laws and tools and ability to stop it that was created while we were watching umbrella academy.

      Now the final nail is using media to create a foot-in-the-door technique where media convince the public to hate a new thing. Once that zeitgeist is established laws will then slowly be created by as suggested by lobbyists which are really just a facade that would give more power to take out pirates.

      Anyone know the names of the pirate Bay owners? a/Anyone hear any news on those guys. Podcasts? Articles? Viral Reddit posts? In my mind it’s probably one of the top ten craziest political strong arming and over reaches in the past decade. Here is the story that I can’t find for some reason. Pirate Bay placed a server inside a bank in Switzerland. The Swedish laws prevent the government from touching anything inside the bank. Freedom type thing that the USA love. This means the Swedish government couldn’t be forced to shut down the server. Until Mike Pompeo on behalf of Hollywood flies to Switzerland and says you’re going in or America is going to make you pay. So they change the law for America and seize the servers. My point is this is pretty fun incredibly interesting story. But we don’t get these stories we get another season of making handsome real life serial killer show on Netflix. Pirating dies by suppressing it slowly over time until there’s no more pirates and the ability to regain the knowledge lost its gone and trying to look up how to crack anything results in the FBI at your door and you on a no fly list. Just like other pirates and creators of technology (look up how tor creators get harassed) and these stories all get suppressed.

      https://darknetdiaries.com/transcript/92/

    • Zerfallen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      The thing is, as we learned with Netflix (and… everything lately), even if it starts off convenient and reasonable, that will last only long enough that they think they’ve cornered the market. So unless something changes to guarantee an ongoing reasonable proposition, i will never trust them again.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    All this does is make me more interested in “pirating” their infinitely copyable material. More to the point it’s making my interest in financially supporting them drop to zero if not lower.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      With Usenet, Plex* (Streaming Server), Radarr (automated movie downloading) and Sonarr (automated TV downloading and management) it’s never been easier!

      *Plex is currently on a slow path of enshittification and the only other good alternative, Jellyfin, still has some ways to go before it can pass “The Spouse Test”. I myself have only had Jellyfin in testing and not yet replaced Plex with it. But that day is coming. Jellyfin is well under active development and I have no doubt it will get to feature and stability parity with Plex

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Where’s Jellyfin failing the spouse test? My spouse preferred it to Plex because she could turn off all the crap on the home screen.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          After looking at this list I’d like to pre-qualify what I’m about to say: I have jellyfin and like it, I use jellyfin regularly. I have it pointed to the same catalog as Plex and if Plex ever gets thoroughly enshitified I will leave it for jellyfin

          The biggest things I’ve seen (in decreasing order of pain):

          transcoding can fail on media that Plex has no problems with

          Jellyfin is significantly worse at detecting names and properly assigning metadata. Jellyfin does not have the same ease of fixing that when it happens that Plex has.

          I’m not going to go through all the work to reverse proxy it. Nor do I trust opening it to the internet. So for her to access it outside the house she’s going to be using tailscale. Kind of just extra steps for the sake of extra steps.

          Finamp is a poor replacement for Plexamp, Don’t get me wrong I love the fan project but it’s not anywhere near as good, and it becomes quite painful to use on large audio catalogs.

          The Roku client doesn’t have any method to mark things as watched or unwatched or modified playlisted items.

          I dislike the sections being static one row high and then having to rotate left and right through multiple things when they could just wrap.

          I am super amazed that the project runs as well as it does. It’s a monumental piece of open source work, but there’s a lot of polish problems and I’m not qualified to help them fix them.

          Edit: oh and I really really miss these skip intro Skip credits option that Plex has.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Just general glitchiness, odd UI design choices etc. Def needs more polish

          When I say Spouse Test I mean from the context of a spouse who just “doesn’t do computers”, if your spouse is technically inclined at all, say as a PC gamer or something and has dealt with sometimes-kinda-annoying software and has some patience, then they’ll probably be fine with it

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            This makes sense. I had to poke around the UI to figure it out. And, the client occasionally needs rebooted or the cache cleared. I can see how some users would have trouble.

            I’d suggest that teaching those users is probably easier than setting up Plex today and then setting up Jellyfin as an emergency service when Plex inevitably begins ad injection or introduces a paywall for local streaming.

  • endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Honestly most of the modern movies are so bad that even nobody will most likely want to pirate them

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          I really don’t know why they made it. If it had been an actual sequel to the original that in some way carried on the story that would have been okay.

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              The only allusion to it being a sequel is the bin full of drones from the original. That’s as close to the original cast as it gets.

              They couldn’t even be arsed to Ghostbusters it up by getting the old crew to show the youngsters how it’s done.

              You can guess the ending about ten seconds in, and the ending is actually worse than that.

              Plus I really don’t like Glen Powell. The man looks designed by committee by Hollywood to normalise age gap relationships. He gives me the fucking creeps.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    What is immoral about this is that they will essentially use paying customer’s money to chase down an unachievable goal.

    Just goes to show you, companies have no integrity. If they truly were about providing the best experience for paying customers, they’d be like valve and just focus on their own service’s quality.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Exactly, piracy is a service problem.

      I cancelled my Disney+ subscription of 2+ years because offline playback isn’t reliable and they raised prices to the point where it’s cheaper for me to buy the physical media I want, rip it, and use Jellyfin to play those offline. If I wasn’t so stubborn about paying for content, I’d just pirate it and do the same.

      • littlecolt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Why are you using Jellyfin to play offline media? Isn’t the point of Jellyfin to have access to your media through a network?

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          For me it’s easier to rip it once and then have it available on my tv, phone, or computer. It can also remember what episode is next. Plus no annoying mandatory commercials every time you put the disk in the player.

          • littlecolt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Right but, and I understand you aren’t the person I was originally replying to, they said offline. Offline, so NOT on all these devices out there in the world. That would very much imply ONLINE.

                • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Have you not heard of a router? Sure i have an internet connection but i wouldnt have to. Lots of people have subnetworks that are isolated from outside network access, and my router would still be able to stream from my computer to my laptop even if my internet was down or i unplugged the modem. The last time they did scheduled maintenance on my internet thats exactly what i did, i streamed things that i had previously downloaded and saved on a different computer.